Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Previous articleNext article No AccessConsensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?Finnur DellsénFinnur Dellsén Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited The British Journal the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: Society Views: 62Total views on site Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/718273 HistoryAccepted November 18, 2021 PDF download Crossref reports no citing article.
منابع مشابه
Content or Context: Which Carries More Weight in Predicting Popularity of Tweets in China
Through writing short tweets in microblogging sites, millions of users document their life, provide commentary and opinions, express deeply felt emotions, and articulate ideas. How does the content generated by a user compete with the content by others to attract limited human attention? With a framework developed from heuristic-systematic model of information processing, the study aims to unco...
متن کاملConsensus and Unanimity at the Supreme Court of Canada
Empirical studies of judicial decision-making tend to focus on explaining why individual judges often come to different conclusions. The dominant understanding of decision-making on the U.S. Supreme Court is the ideologically based policy preferences of the justices, with related studies showing that American justices often make strategic choices to ensure the Court’s decisions reflect their pr...
متن کاملROTATING HINGE VERSUS CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE REPLACEMENT: WHICH ONE IS ACTUALLY MORE CONSTRAINED? A FINITE ELEMENT STUDY
This was Presented in 5th International Congress of Iranian Iranian Society of Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy, and Sports Traumatology (ISKAST), 14-17 Feb 2018- Kish, Iran
متن کاملCoalitional unanimity versus strategy-proofness in coalition formation problems
This paper examines coalition formation problems from the viewpoint of mechanism design. We consider the case where (i) the list of feasible coalitions (those coalitions which are permitted to form) is given in advance; and (ii) each individual’s preference is a ranking over those feasible coalitions which include this individual. We are interested in requiring the mechanism to guarantee each c...
متن کاملWhich Metric Is More Appropriate to Evaluate Researchers?
Iranian medical universities choose their best researchers in each field annually. The protocols of this process have been modified quite often, but the changes were not fundamental and did not lead to all-inclusive evaluation tools. The recent article in Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology, which proposes a scoring scale for evaluation of scientist's impact called "360-degree researcher...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0007-0882', '1464-3537']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/718273